The WhatsApp Reply Every Salesperson Hates: “I’ll Update You.”

Customer:
Dr., could you send us a proposal for this project? We’d like to present it at our meeting next week.

Me:
Sure. When’s the deadline?

Customer:
The sooner, the better.

Me:
Alright. My team will get it ready.

(Three days later.)

Me:
The proposal is ready. I’ve emailed it over. If there’s anything you’d like us to revise, just let me know.

Customer:
Thanks, Dr. I’ll keep you updated.

(A week passes…)

Me:
Hi, have you had a chance to review the proposal?

Customer:
Sorry, Dr. I’ve been tied up. I’ll update you soon.

(A month passes…)

Me:
Hi, any progress?

Customer:
It’s still under evaluation.

(Two months pass…)

Me:
Hi, just following up again. Any news?

Customer:
No decision yet.

(Three months pass…)

Me:
Hi…

Customer:
👍

(Four months pass…)

Me:
Assalamualaikum. Hope you’re doing well. Just following up on the project we discussed.

Customer:
Waalaikumussalam, Dr. Sorry, I forgot to let you know. The project was actually awarded to another vendor.

Me:
Oh… when was it awarded?

Customer:
About two months ago.

Me:
😐

Customer:
I hope you won’t take it personally. If another opportunity comes up, I’ll definitely look for you.

(I close WhatsApp and slowly shake my head.)

Me (talking to myself):

In sales, sometimes your proposal doesn’t lose because of the technical solution or the price.

Sometimes it loses to the most popular status update on WhatsApp…

“I’ll keep you updated.”

Why Seeing Your Brand Once Is Never Enough: The Science Behind the B2B Buying Decision

In B2B technology marketing, posting once and hoping for conversion is one of the most common and costly mistakes. The Rule of 7 is just the starting point. For IoT platforms, AIoT training, and smart city solutions, the real buying journey demands 12 to 20 meaningful touchpoints before serious action begins.

How many times does a potential customer need to encounter your brand before they are ready to act?

Most marketers have heard of the Rule of 7, the long-standing principle that a buyer needs at least seven brand exposures before taking action. The University of Maryland traces this back to early advertising research, and while the number has been cited across decades of marketing literature, the principle itself has never been more relevant than it is today. In fact, for B2B technology companies selling complex solutions such as IoT platforms, AIoT training, smart city systems, or system integrator services, seven may not even be close to enough.

The Rule of 7 Is a Starting Point, Not a Ceiling

The original Rule of 7 was conceived in a world where buyers had far fewer choices and far fewer distractions. Today, a prospective customer is bombarded with hundreds of brand messages daily across social media, email, search, video, and messaging apps. Cutting through that noise requires more than a single touchpoint or even a handful.

A more practical and realistic framework looks like this. For low-cost, low-risk consumer products where the customer already understands the need, three to five exposures may be sufficient. For B2B software, IoT platforms, training programs, and consulting services where trust must be established before any commitment is made, seven to twelve exposures is a more reasonable expectation. For high-value, technical, government, enterprise, or long sales-cycle decisions, the number often climbs beyond fifteen.

The buyer in a B2B context is rarely a single person making a spontaneous decision. There are budget holders, technical evaluators, procurement officers, and end users, each requiring their own reassurance at their own pace.

The Buying Journey Is No Longer a Straight Line

Google’s research into the modern customer journey confirms what many sales teams already suspect: the path from first awareness to final purchase is not linear. Buyers today move fluidly between searching, scrolling, streaming, and comparing. They might encounter a LinkedIn post on a Monday, watch a product demonstration video on a Wednesday, read a case study on a Friday, and then not think about it again for three weeks, until a colleague mentions the same solution.

This fragmented, non-linear journey means that brand presence must be consistent, varied, and sustained. A company that posts once and then goes quiet is invisible in the decision-making process.

The real question to ask is not simply how many times a buyer must see the brand. The more important question is whether they are seeing the right message at the right stage of their journey.

Mapping Exposures to the Buyer’s State of Mind

For a company like Favoriot, which operates in the IoT and AIoT space and targets enterprise clients, government agencies, and system integrators, the exposure journey can be mapped across three distinct stages.

At the awareness stage, five to seven exposures serve to establish name recognition. The buyer begins to register that Favoriot exists and that it is active in the space they care about. They are not yet evaluating, but they are noticing.

At the trust-building stage, eight to twelve exposures shift the conversation from recognition to understanding. The buyer starts to grasp what Favoriot actually does, why it matters, and how it differs from alternatives. This is where thought leadership content, technical deep-dives, and customer stories begin to do their heaviest lifting.

At the purchase confidence stage, twelve to twenty meaningful exposures bring the buyer to a point where they are ready to initiate contact, request pricing, attend a training session, or discuss a potential project. This is not a passive audience anymore. They have been quietly building a case internally, and now they are ready to move.

Repetition with Variation Is the Real Strategy

The mistake many technology companies make is treating content as a one-time announcement rather than an ongoing conversation. They publish a product update, send one email campaign, and then wait for the pipeline to fill. When nothing happens, the conclusion is often that the market is not ready, when the real issue is that the message has not been delivered enough times or in enough forms.

The approach that works is repetition with variation. The core message stays consistent, but the angle changes with each touchpoint. One week it is a problem statement framed around a real challenge facing a city or an enterprise. The next week it is a customer story showing how a specific outcome was achieved. Then comes a webinar invitation, followed by a demonstration video, a data sheet, a LinkedIn article, a referral from a trusted partner, and eventually a direct proposal.

Each of these formats reaches a different segment of the buyer’s brain at a different moment in the journey. The cumulative effect is what transforms a vague sense of familiarity into a genuine willingness to engage.

Building a Brand That Earns the Right to Be Remembered

For any B2B technology company competing in a space where contracts take months and stakeholders number in the double digits, the discipline of sustained, multi-channel presence is not optional. It is the entire game.

The practical target for companies in this space is a minimum of seven meaningful touchpoints, with a realistic planning horizon of twelve to twenty before serious buying conversations begin. That means building a content calendar that spans LinkedIn posts, email sequences, webinar series, case study libraries, video demonstrations, partner referrals, and direct outreach, all carrying the same core message from a different direction.

The goal is to move the buyer from “I think I have seen that name before” all the way to “I think we should set up a meeting with them.”

How many touchpoints has your company planned for this quarter, and are they designed to move buyers forward or simply to fill a content calendar?


This article draws on principles from Favoriot’s market strategy for IoT and AIoT adoption in B2B and enterprise environments. Favoriot provides IoT platforms, AIoT training, and smart city solutions for system integrators, enterprises, and government agencies across Southeast Asia.

Why Blogging When Nobody Was Reading Was the Best Business Decision I Ever Made

The long game of content, before it was called content marketing. How years of blogging to an empty room became the foundation of a business, a reputation, and a life’s work in IoT.

Let me ask you something. If you wrote something today and nobody read it, would you write again tomorrow?

Most people would say no. And I understand why. We live in a world that measures everything in likes, shares, reach and impressions. If the numbers don’t move, the assumption is that nothing is working. That you are wasting your time. That maybe you should stop.

I started blogging around 2009. At that time, IoT was barely a word in people’s vocabulary. Social media was young. And I was writing about telemetry, machine-to-machine communication, and connected devices… to what felt like an empty room. The analytics were humble, to put it kindly. Sometimes a few dozen readers a day. Sometimes less.

But here is what I know now that I didn’t fully appreciate then: that empty room was being recorded.

Planting Seeds Before Anyone Was Hungry

When I wrote in those early years, I wasn’t writing to go viral. I was writing because I had ideas that needed to get out of my head and onto paper. I was processing things I had seen in my career at MIMOS, CELCOM and UTM. I was trying to make sense of where technology was heading, and writing was how I thought through things properly.

There was no content calendar. No SEO strategy. No analytics dashboard I checked obsessively every morning. Just me, a laptop, and the belief that what I was writing about actually mattered, even if the world hadn’t caught up yet.

And then IoT exploded.

Between 2013 and 2015, the conversation around connected devices went from niche to mainstream almost overnight. And suddenly, people were looking for someone who understood the space, someone who had been thinking about it, writing about it, for years. That someone was already there. I had the archive. I had the track record. I had the voice.

That is when I understood what I had been doing all along. I had been building credibility on a platform I owned, quietly, consistently, before there was any social pressure to perform.

The Business That Content Built

When I co-founded FAVORIOT in 2017, I didn’t have to start from zero when it came to reputation. The blog had done years of work. Every article I had written about IoT platforms, smart city infrastructure, the challenges of data connectivity… those were bread crumbs that led people to me long before FAVORIOT existed as a company.

Investors ask you what makes you credible in your space. Customers ask why they should trust you over a larger competitor. Journalists ask why your opinion matters. What I could always point to was the body of work. Not a pitch deck, not a fancy website, but hundreds of posts that showed how I thought, what I believed, and how long I had been in this conversation.

You cannot fake a ten-year archive of consistent ideas.

That is what content does when you treat it seriously over a long period of time. It becomes proof. It becomes your reputation, made searchable and permanent.

When Nobody Is Watching, That Is the Real Test

I want to be honest about something. There were stretches of time when I wondered if I should just stop. The numbers were not rewarding. Nobody was sharing my posts to their thousands of followers. The inbox was quiet.

But I kept asking myself: do I believe what I am writing? Do I think this matters?

The answer was always yes. And that is what kept me going.

Looking back, I think the discipline of writing when nobody was watching was actually what built the quality of my thinking. When you write for an audience that doesn’t exist yet, you can’t rely on trending topics or viral hooks. You have to write something true. You have to be genuinely useful. You have to develop a real point of view, because there’s no performance to hide behind.

That pressure, the pressure of honesty over popularity, sharpened me in ways that no conference or workshop ever could.

The Compound Interest of Ideas

There is a concept in finance called compound interest. Money grows not just from what you put in, but from the returns building on themselves over time. Content works exactly the same way.

A post I wrote in 2011 about sensor networks brought me a speaking invitation in 2014. A talk in 2014 turned into a collaboration in 2016. A collaboration in 2016 led to a client for FAVORIOT in 2019. And so on. The chain of connections is rarely obvious when you are in the middle of it. You only see it clearly when you look backwards.

If I had stopped blogging in 2010 because the numbers were small, none of those downstream opportunities would have existed. The compound interest would never have started accumulating.

This is what people miss when they treat content as a short-term campaign. Content is infrastructure. You build it slowly, you maintain it, and it works for you even when you are sleeping, traveling, or running a startup that demands every hour of your attention.

What I Tell Founders and Professionals Who Ask Me About Content

People often ask me: “Mazlan, should I start a blog? Should I write on LinkedIn? Is it worth it?”

My answer is always the same. Ask yourself not whether anyone will read it today, but whether you believe what you are writing is true and useful. If yes, write it. Then write it again next week. And the week after that.

Stop thinking about content as a marketing activity. Start thinking about it as a thinking habit that happens to be public.

Because the day will come, and I genuinely believe this for anyone with real expertise and something honest to say, the day will come when someone will find that old post you wrote when nobody was looking, and it will open a door you never expected.

I have lived that story more times than I can count. And it all started with a decision to write anyway, even when the room was empty.

So let me leave you with this: what do you know right now, in your field, in your experience, that the world hasn’t fully caught up to yet? Are you writing it down? Are you sharing it?

Because someone out there is about to start searching for exactly what you already know.

Life on Stage: The Journey of a Speaker Who Never Asked to Become One

Mazlan Abbas  ·  Founder Reflections  ·  2025

Life on Stage: The Journey of a Speaker Who Never Asked to Become One

From a single university talk to hundreds of stages across four continents

If someone asks me, “Mazlan, how many times have you given a presentation?” I’ll just smile. Not out of arrogance. But because I honestly can’t remember. What I do remember is that it didn’t start because I wanted to be a speaker. It started because I had something worth sharing, and people began to listen.

This isn’t a post about achievements. It isn’t a resume list. This is a story about what happened between all those numbers. What I felt standing in front of a room. What I carried back to the hotel. What changed in me, one presentation at a time.

Every time I stepped onto a stage, I asked myself the same question: am I here to teach, or am I here to learn?

The answer was always both.

The expert in anything was once a beginner who refused to stop showing up.
Helen Hayes
2013 – 2015  ·  Seeds Planted

In the early days, I was talking about something most people hadn’t fully grasped yet. IoT. Internet of Things. Back then, when people heard “IoT” their faces went blank. I remember giving a talk at UTHM with barely any questions at the end… but I knew the seeds had to be planted early. Someone needed to walk away thinking, “Huh, that’s actually interesting.”

When I delivered the keynote at the International Conference on Soft Computing in Data Science 2015 at Pullman Putrajaya, I could feel the shift. People were beginning to take it seriously. “Internet of Things and Big Data: The Perfect Marriage” was the title I chose myself. Not for the glamour, but because I genuinely believed these two things were made for each other.

2016 – 2017  ·  The Stage Gets Bigger

These years were relentless. Singapore. Sydney. Jakarta. Kuwait. I was standing in front of people from different countries, talking about smart cities, IoT ecosystems, how technology could reshape the way we live. At the Smart Cities Expo World Forum in Sydney 2016, my message was about citizen engagement. Not just infrastructure. Not just data. People.

That’s what everyone always misses. Technology can be brilliant. But if citizens don’t engage, a smart city is just a smart facade.

Kuwait, Singapore, Sydney, Jakarta… not to collect passport stamps. But to bring back perspectives that no office or lab could ever give you.

2017 was also the year I realized something important: I was no longer just an academic or an industry guy. I had become a bridge. Universities invited me. Industries listened. Government agencies started calling. And with that position came a responsibility I didn’t take lightly.

2018 – 2019  ·  Local to Global

There is one moment I will never forget. Keynote at the Smart Cities Global Technologies and Investment Summit in Algiers, Algeria, June 2018. A single Malaysian standing before an audience from North Africa, talking about the IoT innovation ecosystem. There was a flutter of nerves. But far more than that, there was exhilaration.

Because what I brought to that room wasn’t just theory. It came from the real, lived experience of building Favoriot. From every failure and every struggle that no one in the audience could see behind the clean, polished slides.

2019 was even more intense. IIUM. UTeM. UCSI. Polytechnics. Borneo. Istanbul. Sarawak. Topics widened too, from IoT for the Construction Industry, to IR 4.0 for MINDEF. I had stopped talking about IoT in a narrow box. I was talking about transformation. About the future. About how human beings need to adapt or be left behind.

We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.
Albert Einstein
2020 – 2021  ·  The World Changes, So Does the Stage

COVID arrived. Everything moved online. Webinars became everyone’s new language. And I, someone who had grown used to feeling the live energy of a room, had to adapt. Talking to a camera. Q&A via chat box. A different kind of connection, but the same message.

What I valued most during that period was that people still wanted to listen. MaGIC, UTHM, UiTM, USIM, ADTEC, Politeknik Mersing, UKM… the 2021 webinar list was endless. That told me something: curiosity about technology doesn’t stop, even when the world is falling apart.

I gave a talk on “Jobs That Don’t Exist Yet.” Halfway through, it hit me: several of the things I do today didn’t exist ten years ago either.

The talk at MMU on “The Entrepreneurship Journey of Pre and Post Covid-19” was when I felt closest to my audience. Not because the slides were great. But because the story was real. Favoriot faced the same tsunami. We survived, but we carry the scars.

2022 – 2023  ·  Deeper and More Specific

By 2022, the nature of invitations had shifted. People no longer called to hear a general talk about IoT. They wanted specifics. ESG. Manufacturing. Financial services. TVET. Smart cities. The energy sector.

That is a sign of maturity, both in the industry and in myself. Penang, Smart Factory Conference, October 2023: ESG in Manufacturing. That same month, ICSIMA at Tamu Hotel: Smart Measurement with IoT. Then WCIT 2023: 10 Ways IoT Can Drive ESG Compliance.

Some weeks had two or three events. The body was exhausted. But the mind couldn’t stop.

And then there was the keynote I gave with the most heart: ICoICT 2023, August that year. “Humanizing IoT: Placing People at the Centre of Technology.” That wasn’t just a title. That was my philosophy. After years of talking about devices, sensors, and connectivity, I needed to remind the room, and myself, that at the end of every data pipeline there is a human being. A mother who wants to know her child is safe. An elderly man who wants to live with dignity at home. A farmer who needs to know tomorrow’s weather.

2024 – 2025  ·  Rethinking Everything

The DSA 2024 talk on secured IoT communications marked my entry into the cybersecurity conversation in a more serious way. Smart applications demand secure communications. That is not optional. It is a requirement.

UTAR Talk, November 2024, “The Ultimate Things about IoT.” The audience was energetic students, full of questions. The best one: “Sir, in ten years, will IoT still be relevant?” I smiled. In ten years, IoT will be like electricity. You won’t see it, but you’ll need it everywhere.

And most recently, WCSC 2025. “From Smart to Regenerative: Rethinking Urban Transformation through IoT.” This represents a major shift in my thinking. Smart cities are no longer enough. We need cities that can heal themselves, adapt on their own, regenerate. Not just connected, but alive in a deeper sense.

Through all of it, I saw one common thread: I was never really talking about technology. I was talking about the people who use it, and the people who get left behind when they don’t.

At the National Address Conference, July 2025 at WTCKL, I carried a message about Technology and Data Sovereignty. This wasn’t purely a technical talk. It was about the future of a nation. Whoever holds the data holds the power. Malaysia must understand this.


200+Presentations
12+Countries
12Years on Stage
The purpose of life is not to be happy. It is to be useful, to be honorable, to be compassionate, to have it make some difference that you have lived and lived well.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

From 2013 to 2025. Hundreds of times standing on a stage. From UTHM to Algeria. From a small webinar to an international keynote. From speaking in front of 20 students to thousands of delegates.

What do I bring back every single time? Not the applause. Not my name in a programme book. Not a selfie with the organizer.

What I bring back are the questions people ask after the session. Simple questions, but deep ones. Questions that remind me why I started doing all of this in the first place.

This journey isn’t over. The next stage is already waiting. And I still have a great deal left to say.

Because technology keeps moving. And people need to move with it.

The Day a Small Malaysian Company Stood Shoulder to Shoulder with Microsoft, PwC and Mastercard

FAVORIOT has been named one of the Top 50 Thought Leading Companies on Innovation 2026 by Thinkers360, alongside Microsoft, PwC, Mastercard, and Tata Consultancy Services. As the only Malaysian company on this global list, here is what that recognition truly means.

When was the last time you sat quietly and let something truly sink in?

I had one of those moments recently. I was scrolling through the Thinkers360 announcement for their 2026 Top 50 Thought Leading Companies on Innovation, half-expecting to scan through the usual suspects and close the tab. Then I saw it. FAVORIOT. Right there in the list. Alphabetically sandwiched between the giants of the global technology and consulting world.

I had to read it twice.

Thinkers360 is not a popularity contest. It is not the kind of list you get onto by having a big marketing budget or by gaming social media algorithms. That is precisely what makes it different from most rankings out there. Their leaderboard is powered by a patented algorithm that evaluates companies based on authentic, personally authored thought leadership content, which includes articles, books, keynotes, media interviews, podcasts, whitepapers, and speaking engagements. You cannot buy your way in. You cannot inflate your score with fake followers or reshared third-party content. What counts is what your people genuinely know and are willing to share with the world.

So when FAVORIOT appeared alongside Microsoft, PwC, Mastercard, Tata Consultancy Services, HCLTech, and ServiceNow, I did not feel triumphant in the way you might after winning a business pitch. I felt something quieter and deeper than that. I felt grateful, and I felt a kind of responsibility.

Let me put this into context, because context matters enormously here.

FAVORIOT is a Malaysian company. We are not a billion-dollar multinational. We did not emerge from Silicon Valley or London or Singapore’s Orchard Road. We were built in Kuala Lumpur, by a team that believes deeply in the power of IoT to transform how cities are managed, how industries are monitored, and how businesses make decisions with real-time data. We have been doing this since 2017, quietly and consistently, publishing our thoughts, sharing our frameworks, speaking at conferences, writing when others are sleeping, and building a body of knowledge that goes far beyond what our company size might suggest.

And I think that is exactly the point.

Thought leadership has never been about size. It has always been about substance. It has always been about the courage to have a perspective, to write it down, to share it publicly, and to do so consistently even when the audience is small and the applause is quiet.

I remember the early days of FAVORIOT, when I would publish an article about IoT adoption in developing markets and wonder if anyone was reading. I remember speaking at regional conferences where I was one of the few voices pushing the narrative that Southeast Asia did not have to be a technology consumer, we could be a technology contributor. I believed that deeply, and I kept writing, kept speaking, kept building.

What Thinkers360 has done with this ranking is validate something I have always believed: that genuine expertise, consistently shared, eventually finds its audience. Their methodology deliberately looks beyond social media reach and evaluates the full body of work a company produces. The articles your team writes. The keynotes your leaders deliver. The books, the whitepapers, the podcasts, the depth of contribution to the global conversation. That is a hard score to fake, and I am proud that FAVORIOT earned it the hard way.

Being the only Malaysian company on this list carries a weight I do not take lightly. This is not just a FAVORIOT achievement. It is a moment for the Malaysian technology ecosystem to recognise that we belong in the global conversation, not as observers, but as contributors. Our ideas about IoT, smart cities, and enterprise connectivity are not local curiosities. They are relevant globally, and this recognition confirms it.

Standing in the same list as PwC, a firm with over 360,000 employees across 151 countries, or Microsoft, which shapes the technology infrastructure of virtually every organisation on earth, is not something I will pretend feels ordinary. It is extraordinary. But it also tells me something important: the criteria that matter, depth of thought, consistency of publishing, willingness to educate and elevate an industry, those criteria do not require a headcount of thousands. They require commitment.

I often tell my team that we are not just building an IoT platform. We are building a body of thought. We are documenting what works, sharing what does not, and contributing to a global understanding of how connected technologies can solve real problems for real people in real cities. Every article published, every keynote delivered, every insight shared on LinkedIn or our blog is a brick in that structure.

Today, Thinkers360 has told us that structure is visible. That it stands tall enough to be counted among the world’s most influential companies in innovation.

What comes next matters more than the recognition itself. We will continue writing. We will continue speaking. We will continue challenging assumptions about what IoT can do and who gets to lead that conversation. And we will continue carrying the Malaysian flag into rooms where, honestly, not many have taken it before.

If you are building something in this part of the world, something real, something you believe in, and you are doing the quiet, consistent work of sharing your knowledge with the world, I want you to know this: it accumulates. It compounds. And one day, it gets seen.

Are you investing in thought leadership the same way you invest in your product? Because in the end, the companies that shape industries are the ones that shape the conversation first.

Explore the full Thinkers360 50 Thought Leading Companies on Innovation 2026 list. If your organization is building something worth sharing, the global conversation is still wide open, and the world is still listening.

Social Media, Business, and the Invisible War Every Founder Must Learn to Fight

Long before I became a founder, I was already experimenting with social media, not because it was fashionable, not because someone told me personal branding would become important, and not because I had a grand strategy written neatly inside a notebook, but because I could sense that these platforms were quietly changing the way people discovered ideas, trusted experts, followed companies, and made decisions.

It started with Twitter, then Facebook came along, followed by YouTube, LinkedIn, Instagram, and later TikTok and Threads, and with every new platform I joined, I found myself learning the same painful but useful lesson: every platform has its own behaviour, its own audience, its own rhythm, and its own strange way of rewarding or punishing your content.

There were no formal classes for me, no coach sitting beside me, no step-by-step manual that said, “Mazlan, this is exactly how you should build your voice online.” I learned the old-fashioned way by reading, testing, failing, adjusting, and trying again, which sounds noble now, but at that time, it was mostly trial and error with a lot of silent head-scratching in between.

When FAVORIOT started to grow, social media was no longer just a personal space where I shared thoughts, opinions, and reflections. It became part of the business itself, and suddenly I was not only speaking as Mazlan Abbas, the person, but also carrying the voice of FAVORIOT, the company, the brand, the team, and the mission we were trying to build.

That was when things became complicated.

I thought to myself, “So now I have to be myself, represent the company, educate the market, promote the product, build trust, and still sound human at the same time?”

Yes, apparently.

And I had to do all of that while running a startup.

When Social Media Starts Feeling Like a Battlefield

At one point, managing social media felt like being a soldier defending too many frontlines at the same time, because LinkedIn wanted professional insights, Facebook preferred a more personal tone, X rewarded sharp and quick comments, TikTok demanded visual storytelling, Threads wanted casual conversations, Instagram needed strong visuals, and YouTube required patience, planning, and a completely different level of commitment.

Every platform seemed to ask for something different, yet all of them demanded the same thing from me: time, attention, consistency, and energy.

The difficult part was not just posting. Anyone can post. The real challenge was knowing what to say, how to say it, where to say it, and which version of myself should be speaking.

For my personal account, people followed me because they wanted my thoughts, my stories, my experiences, and my reflections. They wanted to see the human side of the founder, not a walking advertisement. For the FAVORIOT account, the expectations were different because the company needed to sound clear, professional, relevant, and trustworthy to customers, partners, developers, investors, universities, and the wider IoT community.

That was where the first real problem appeared: mixed messaging.

The Fine Line Between Personal Voice and Company Voice

The line between a founder and the company can become blurry, especially in a startup where the founder’s face, voice, reputation, and personality are often tied closely to the brand, and while this can be powerful, it can also create confusion if we are not careful.

Whenever I posted too much business content on my personal account, engagement usually dropped because people did not follow me just to receive product updates. They followed me because they wanted perspective, stories, lessons, observations, and sometimes a little honesty about what it really feels like to build something from the ground up.

At the same time, if the company account became too personal, it risked weakening the professional image of the brand, because a company page must serve a different purpose. It must help customers understand what the company does, why it matters, how it solves problems, and why people should trust it.

This was not just a technical content issue. It was an identity issue.

Before pressing publish, I often had to ask myself, “Am I speaking as Mazlan, or am I speaking as FAVORIOT?”

That small question became very important, because personal branding and company branding may support each other, but they should not become the same thing. A personal account earns attention through authenticity, while a company account earns trust through clarity.

“Your personal account earns attention through authenticity. Your company account earns trust through clarity.”

It took me years to truly understand that, and even now, I still remind myself of it whenever I prepare content for different platforms.

The Hardest Battle Is Still Time

If anyone asks me what the biggest challenge is in managing social media as a founder, my answer is very simple: time.

Many people assume content creation means typing a few lines, adding a nice image, and clicking publish, but anyone who has done it seriously knows that one good post can involve research, choosing the right angle, writing the hook, shaping the message, checking the tone, preparing visuals, proofreading, deciding where to post, adjusting the format for each platform, and then monitoring the response after it goes live.

Now multiply that by several platforms.

Then multiply it again by two accounts, one personal and one company.

Then add meetings, proposals, customer follow-ups, speaking engagements, product discussions, investor conversations, staff matters, and the never-ending demands of running a startup.

That is when social media stops looking like a simple marketing activity and starts feeling like another full-time job quietly hiding inside your actual full-time job.

There were moments when I honestly felt like shutting everything down and focusing only on the “real work,” but each time that thought appeared, another thought answered it almost immediately.

“But this is part of the real work now.”

That is the reality for founders today, because social media is no longer optional if you want people to discover you, understand you, evaluate your credibility, and eventually trust you enough to have a serious conversation.

A startup can have a good product, a committed team, and a powerful vision, but if nobody sees it, hears about it, or understands it, the market may assume that nothing much is happening.

And that is dangerous.

Doing Everything Alone Can Drain You Quietly

For a long time, I handled most of the social media work by myself, which meant writing, editing, posting, choosing angles, creating variations, checking responses, replying to comments, and thinking about how to balance the personal voice with the company voice.

From the outside, people only see the final post, but they do not see the hesitation behind it, the drafts that never get published, the captions that are rewritten five times, the posts that are deleted because they do not feel right, or the late-night moment when you stare at the screen and wonder whether the message is useful or just noise.

Founders know this feeling very well.

We are not only building products. We are also building trust, visibility, confidence, and a story that the market can understand.

Many times, we do this with limited people, limited budget, limited time, and limited emotional energy, yet social media continues to demand freshness, consistency, and relevance as if we have a large content department hiding somewhere inside the company.

I thought to myself, “If people knew how much effort goes into one simple post, maybe they would forgive me for occasionally disappearing.”

But the market rarely forgives silence for too long.

If you disappear, people forget.

If you only appear when you want to sell, people resist.

If you post without direction, people get confused.

That is why founders need not only content, but also a system.

Then AI Changed the Way I Work

When AI tools like ChatGPT arrived, my content process changed in a major way, not because AI replaced my thinking or my voice, but because it helped me organise what I already had inside years of writing, speaking, presenting, and explaining.

Before AI, I wrote almost everything from scratch, and that meant every post felt like a new battle with a blank page. Now, I can start from existing material: old blog posts, keynote notes, training slides, customer questions, proposal ideas, or reflections from past experiences.

Over the years, I had written many articles on IoT World and my personal blog, and those articles were filled with experience, analysis, stories, opinions, and lessons that were still relevant. What I did not fully realise before was that all of that content was not old material. It was a content bank waiting to be reused.

A single blog article can now become several Threads posts, a polished LinkedIn article, a casual Facebook update, a short video script, a newsletter idea, or even a talking point for a presentation. The main idea remains the same, but the structure, tone, and length can be adjusted for each platform.

That saved me a lot of time.

More importantly, it reduced the pressure of always creating from zero.

I thought to myself, “Why should I keep starting from an empty page when I already have years of thoughts sitting quietly in my blog?”

That was a turning point.

AI gave me a better rhythm, but it did not remove my responsibility. I still had to decide what mattered, what should be published, what should be edited, what should be removed, and whether the final content sounded like me.

AI can help shape the clay, but the clay must still come from real experience.

“AI should not replace your voice. It should help your voice travel further.”

That is how I see it, because the danger is not in using AI, but in allowing AI to make us sound like everyone else.

Your Old Content May Be More Valuable Than You Think

Many founders underestimate the value of what they already have, because they assume content must always be new, fresh, and created from scratch, when in reality, some of the best content comes from old ideas explained in a clearer and more current way.

Old blog articles can become new social media posts.

Past presentation slides can become short educational content.

Customer questions can become articles.

Training notes can become carousels.

Proposal explanations can become LinkedIn posts.

Mistakes can become lessons.

Founder reflections can become trust-building stories.

Even a simple WhatsApp explanation to a customer can become the seed of a good post, because if one person asked that question, many others may be thinking about the same thing silently.

The key is to stop looking at content as a one-time activity.

Content should be treated like an asset.

You create it once, then reshape it, reuse it, update it, and distribute it in different ways depending on the platform and audience.

This is where AI becomes useful, because it can help turn raw material into different formats quickly, but the source must still be yours. Your voice, your judgement, your stories, and your understanding of the audience cannot be outsourced completely.

AI can help you move faster, but it should not make you disappear from your own content.

Lessons I Learned From Managing Personal and Business Accounts

After many years of managing both personal and company social media accounts, I have learned that clarity is more important than volume.

The first lesson is to separate the purpose of each account. Your personal account should carry your stories, reflections, opinions, values, and human experiences, while your company account should focus on customer problems, product value, use cases, industry education, credibility, and business outcomes.

The second lesson is to build a content bank before you need it. Do not wait until you are tired, busy, or under pressure before thinking about what to post, because that is when content becomes stressful. Save ideas continuously, collect useful questions, keep links to your old articles, and record your best explanations when they appear naturally.

The third lesson is to use AI as an assistant, not as a replacement. Let it help with structure, tone, rewriting, repurposing, and idea expansion, but never surrender your judgement, because AI may produce words, but only you know whether those words carry the right meaning for your audience.

The fourth lesson is to master one or two platforms first instead of trying to be everywhere at the same time. Many founders try to appear on every platform and end up weak on all of them, when they should first understand where their audience spends time and what kind of content works best there.

The fifth lesson is to respect the character of each platform. LinkedIn is suitable for professional insights and deeper reflections, Facebook allows a more personal touch, Threads feels more conversational, TikTok needs visual storytelling, and YouTube rewards those who can explain ideas with patience and consistency.

The sixth lesson is to measure what matters. Likes and views are pleasant, but meaningful comments, direct messages, serious enquiries, partnership discussions, speaking invitations, and sales leads are much better signals that your content is creating real value.

The seventh lesson is to accept that consistency matters more than perfection. A steady flow of useful and honest content is more powerful than one perfect post every few months, because people trust those who show up repeatedly with something worth saying.

Social Media Is a Marathon, Not a Firework Show

Social media is not a one-week campaign, a single viral post, or a magic trick that suddenly turns a quiet startup into a famous brand overnight. It is a long game of showing up, learning from your audience, improving your message, and staying visible without becoming a slave to the algorithm.

Some posts will perform well.

Some will disappear quietly.

Some will attract customers.

Some will attract critics.

Some will open doors you never expected.

Some will teach you what your audience truly cares about.

That is part of the process.

The founders who survive social media are not always the loudest or the most polished. Many times, they are the ones who know how to pace themselves, reuse their content wisely, protect their energy, stay clear about their message, and keep showing up even when the response is not immediate.

After all these years, I am still learning.

I am still experimenting.

I am still adjusting.

But now, with AI beside me, I no longer see social media as a monster waiting to eat my time. I see it as a set of channels that can carry my thoughts, my work, and FAVORIOT’s story to the people who need to hear it.

Not perfectly.

But consistently.

And for a founder, consistency is already a very big win.

So let me ask you this.

Are you managing your personal and business social media accounts on your own, or do you already have a team helping you? What has been your biggest challenge so far?

Share your experience in the comments.

Source based on the uploaded text.

How To Create Viral Posts with a Hook

I used to think the best posts were the most informative ones.

The ones with the most data. The most research. The most carefully crafted sentences.

So I would spend hours writing.

Editing. Rewriting. Polishing.

And then I would publish.

And wait.

Sometimes, nothing happened.

A few likes. Maybe a comment or two from people who already knew me.

But no shares. No new followers. No real traction.

Meanwhile, I would scroll through my feed and see someone else’s post — shorter than mine, less detailed than mine — getting hundreds of reactions.

How?

I sat with that question for a long time.

Until I finally understood the real answer.

It was not about the content.

It was about the first line.

Nobody Reads What They Don’t Click

Here is something that took me embarrassingly long to accept.

People do not read posts.

They scan them.

They scroll past hundreds of updates every single day. They are moving fast. Their attention is already somewhere else.

And in that tiny moment — that split second — they decide.

Keep scrolling.

Or stop.

That decision happens before they read a single word of your actual content.

It happens at the first line.

That first line is called the hook.

And if your hook does not grab them, nothing else matters.

Not your insights. Not your story. Not your carefully structured arguments.

None of it.

Because they never got that far.

The Moment I Finally Understood This

I remember posting something on LinkedIn a while back.

It was a detailed post about IoT adoption challenges in Malaysia.

Lots of context. Lots of nuance. Lots of things I genuinely believed people needed to hear.

I opened with something like:

“The Internet of Things has been growing rapidly over the past decade, and many organisations are now beginning to recognise its potential…”

It barely moved.

A few weeks later, I wrote another post.

Same topic, roughly.

But this time I opened with:

“I almost gave up on Favoriot in 2019.”

That post reached thousands of people.

Same me. Same platform. Same audience.

Different first line.

Everything changed.

What Makes a Hook Actually Work

I have been studying this for a while now.

Not just reading about it.

Actually testing it. Watching what works. Noticing what stops the scroll.

And here is what I have learned.

A good hook does one of three things.

It makes people curious. It makes people feel something. Or it makes people think “that is exactly my problem.”

The best hooks do all three at once.

Let me break it down.

Type 1: The Curiosity Hook

This is the classic cliffhanger.

You reveal just enough to make people want more.

“I made one change to my LinkedIn profile and tripled my inbound messages.”

“Nobody told me this would happen when I became a founder.”

“I was completely wrong about how viral posts work.”

See what those have in common?

They open a loop.

The human brain hates open loops. It wants to close them.

So it keeps reading.

The key is to tease the answer without giving it away. Enough to promise value. Not enough to satisfy without reading further.

Type 2: The Emotion Hook

Facts tell. Feelings sell.

When you open with something emotionally real, people lean in.

“I cried after my first investor meeting. Not because it went badly. Because it went exactly as planned.”

“The day I realised I was becoming a human FAQ was the day everything changed.”

“I have given hundreds of talks. But one question from a student stopped me cold.”

Emotion creates connection.

It reminds people that behind every profile, there is a human being.

And human beings are drawn to other human beings, not information machines.

Type 3: The Problem Hook

This is my personal favourite.

You name a pain that your reader already feels.

Immediately.

Before they even know you understand them.

“Most IoT projects fail not because of technology. But because of this one blind spot.”

“You are creating content every day. But nobody outside your network is seeing it.”

“You have been writing posts for months. But your follower count has barely moved.”

When people read a hook like that, they stop scrolling because they think:

Wait. Is this person talking about me?

Yes.

That is exactly the feeling you want.

The Formula I Use Now

I am not going to pretend I have cracked some magic formula.

But I do have a starting checklist.

Before I publish anything, I ask myself five questions about my first line.

Does it make someone curious or create an open loop?

Does it touch a real emotion — not a manufactured one?

Does it name a problem my reader actually has?

Can it stand alone? If someone only read this one sentence, would they want more?

Would I stop scrolling if this appeared in my feed?

If the answer is no to most of those, I rewrite the opening.

Sometimes three or four times.

Because the rest of the post is irrelevant if the first line does not work.

The Mistake Most People Keep Making

The most common mistake I see?

People bury the hook.

They write a long preamble. They give context before they create curiosity. They explain the situation before they create tension.

Something like:

“As someone who has been in the technology space for over twenty years, I have seen many trends come and go. Today I want to share some thoughts about content creation and why it matters in the age of social media…”

By the time you reach the actual point, the reader is already gone.

Start with the tension. Start with the emotion. Start with the problem.

Then build the context.

Not the other way around.

One More Thing

I want to be honest about something.

Writing good hooks felt uncomfortable at first.

It felt like I was being dramatic. Like I was sensationalising. Like it was not really me.

But then I realised something important.

A hook is not manipulation.

A hook is respect.

It respects the reader’s time. It signals that what follows is worth their attention. It earns the right to be read.

If your content genuinely helps people, then writing a compelling hook is not a trick.

It is a responsibility.

So Here Is My Challenge to You

Go back to your last five posts.

Look at the first line of each one.

And ask yourself honestly:

Would you have stopped scrolling for that?

If the answer makes you a little uncomfortable, that is okay.

That is where the growth is.

Rewrite one opening today.

Just one.

See what happens.

I am curious to know.


What kind of hook has worked best for you? Drop it in the comments. Let’s learn from each other.

The Top 10 Things to Attract Readers on LinkedIn

By Dr. Mazlan Abbas


LinkedIn has changed more in the past twelve months than in the five years before that.

The algorithm most people are still using as a mental model no longer exists. The tactics that reliably worked in 2023 and 2024 are actively being penalised today. And the professionals who have not yet adapted are watching their reach quietly decline — often without understanding why.

I have been posting on LinkedIn for years. I have built a following, attracted speaking invitations, and grown FAVORIOT’s visibility primarily through consistent content on this platform. In that time I have watched every major shift in how the algorithm behaves.

Here is what I have learned — and what is actually working right now in 2026.

Why LinkedIn Has Become Harder — and More Rewarding

LinkedIn shifted its entire ranking model in early 2026. The old system rewarded you based on how many connections you had and how quickly a post picked up likes. The new system works more like TikTok for professionals.

It is now an interest graph, not a social graph.

What that means in practice: your content is no longer just shown to your connections. It is distributed to people who have demonstrated interest in your topic — whether or not they follow you. A well-crafted post from a smaller account can now reach further than a poorly crafted post from an account with fifty thousand followers.

This is actually good news for thought leaders who produce genuine insight.

But it also means that average content — generic advice, motivational quotes, promotional announcements — receives almost no distribution at all.

The bar has gone up. Here is how to clear it.

1. Start With a Hook That Earns the Click

LinkedIn shows readers only the first two lines of your post before they have to click “see more.”

Those two lines are your entire pitch.

If your opening line does not create curiosity, make a surprising claim, or signal clear value, most people scroll past. The algorithm also registers this behaviour. A post that loses readers immediately is pushed to fewer people. A post that earns the click gets rewarded with broader distribution.

The openers that work:

  • A specific, counterintuitive claim: “Most LinkedIn advice is designed for people who already have an audience. Here is what actually works when you are starting from zero.”
  • A direct provocation: “Your LinkedIn profile is losing you speaking opportunities. Here is what to fix this week.”
  • A numbered promise: “After 200+ keynotes, I still make this one mistake when pitching to new audiences.”

What does not work: “Excited to share some thoughts on…” or “I have been reflecting on…” These tell the reader nothing and give them no reason to stop scrolling.

2. Optimise for Dwell Time, Not Likes

The 2026 LinkedIn algorithm measures how long people actually spend reading your post — not just whether they clicked a reaction button.

A post that someone reads for thirty seconds now outperforms a post that collected fifty quick likes. LinkedIn calls this signal “dwell time,” and it has become one of the most important ranking factors in the feed.

What this means for how you write:

Keep paragraphs short — one to three sentences each. Use white space generously. Structure your post so the reader has a reason to keep going line by line. Write posts that are long enough to hold attention but tight enough that no sentence feels wasted.

The optimal post length for maximum dwell time tends to be 300 to 400 words. Long enough to build an argument, short enough to finish in a single sitting.

3. Use Carousels for Maximum Reach

Of all the formats currently available on LinkedIn, document carousels generate the highest average engagement — roughly 6.6 percent, compared to around 2 percent for text-only posts.

The reason is structural. Carousels force the reader to swipe through multiple slides. Each swipe extends dwell time and signals genuine interest to the algorithm. They are also highly shareable and saveable, which are the two engagement actions LinkedIn now values most.

What makes a carousel perform well:

  • Lead with a slide that makes a specific claim or promise
  • Use text-oriented slides over image-oriented ones — stories are easier to tell with words
  • Keep each slide focused on a single idea
  • End with a clear takeaway or call to action on the final slide

If you write long-form posts regularly, almost every one of them can be repurposed into a carousel. The content already exists. The format just makes it more discoverable.

4. Build Saves, Not Just Likes

LinkedIn added Saves and Sends to post analytics in late 2025. That was not a coincidence. It was a signal about what the platform now rewards.

A save tells the algorithm: this content is valuable enough to return to later. A send tells the algorithm: this content is worth sharing privately with someone else. These two actions now drive significantly more reach than a standard like.

The implication is clear. Create content people want to bookmark.

That means frameworks, checklists, step-by-step guides, data-backed insights, and lessons from real experience. The question to ask before posting is: would someone save this to refer back to later? If the answer is no, the post probably needs more substance.

5. Write for Your Niche, Not for Everyone

LinkedIn’s algorithm now identifies what it calls your “topic DNA.”

It distributes your content based on demonstrated expertise in a specific area, not based on your network size. A post about IoT platform mistakes reaches IoT practitioners and enterprise decision-makers — regardless of whether they follow you — because the algorithm recognises the topic and the audience that engages with it.

The practical consequence: broad, general content performs poorly. Specific, niche content performs disproportionately well.

Write for one person — the specific professional who would benefit most from what you know. A post written for IoT startup founders will outperform a post written for “anyone interested in technology.”

The more specific you are, the further the algorithm pushes your content into the right hands.

6. The First 60 Minutes Determine Everything

When you publish a post, LinkedIn initially shows it to a small sample of your network — roughly two to five percent of your connections.

How that sample responds in the first hour determines the total lifetime reach of the post. Research suggests that only five percent of posts that underperform in the first hour recover to reach a broader audience.

What this means in practice:

  • Post when your audience is most active, typically weekday mornings
  • Respond to every early comment quickly — this signals active conversation to the algorithm
  • Do not post and disappear immediately after publishing

The first hour is not just a window. It is the window.

7. Never Put External Links in the Post Body

This is one of the most commonly ignored rules on LinkedIn — and one of the most costly to break.

Posts that include external links in the body see approximately 60 percent less reach than equivalent posts without them. LinkedIn actively suppresses content that drives users away from the platform.

The workaround most people used — putting the link in the first comment — has also been penalised as of early 2026.

The better approach: make the post complete and valuable on its own. If you want to reference an article, a report, or a website, mention it by name in the post and let interested readers find it themselves. Or put the link in a comment, but do not lead with it or frame the post around it.

LinkedIn rewards content that keeps people on LinkedIn.

8. Personal Profiles Outperform Company Pages — By a Wide Margin

One of the clearest findings from 2026 LinkedIn research: personal profiles now generate five times more engagement than company pages.

The algorithm is built to surface authentic human voices, not brand broadcasts. A post from you as an individual — sharing a lesson, an opinion, a real experience — will reach further than the same content posted from a company page.

For anyone building a personal brand alongside a company or startup, this is the most important structural insight on this list.

Invest in your personal profile first. Let the company page support from the background.

The most visible founders and executives on LinkedIn are not posting from their company accounts. They are posting as themselves — and the company benefits from the credibility that follows.

9. Engage Like You Mean It

The 2026 algorithm has become very good at detecting hollow engagement.

“Great post!” and emoji-only comments no longer generate meaningful algorithmic benefit for you or the person you commented on. LinkedIn’s systems can distinguish between genuine professional conversation and automated or low-effort interaction — and they reward the former while increasingly suppressing the latter.

When you engage with another post, write a response that adds something. A different perspective. A follow-up question. A relevant experience. A specific disagreement.

When people comment on your posts, reply with the same quality. Conversations that go two or three levels deep generate far more reach than posts with fifty single-word reactions.

Engagement is not a vanity activity. It is how the algorithm learns who you are and who to show your content to.

10. Be Consistent — But Make Every Post Count

The algorithm in 2026 rewards depth and authority over posting volume.

One valuable, well-structured post per week consistently outperforms five forgettable ones. If you publish more frequently, make sure each post earns its place. Content that performs poorly — that loses readers quickly, generates no saves, and triggers no real conversation — signals low quality to the algorithm and can suppress the reach of your subsequent posts.

The professionals winning on LinkedIn right now are not posting more. They are posting better.

Build a sustainable rhythm that you can maintain for months, not weeks. Decide on your core topics and stay close to them. Let your “topic DNA” build over time. The algorithm rewards consistency within a niche more than it rewards volume across many topics.

Putting It Together

LinkedIn in 2026 is harder to game and more rewarding when you do it right.

The platform has moved decisively away from rewarding connections, follower counts, and quick likes. It now rewards demonstrated expertise, genuine engagement, content people save and share, and consistent presence within a defined niche.

That is actually good news for practitioners and founders who have real knowledge to share.

The tactics above are not shortcuts. They are the structural conditions under which LinkedIn now distributes content. Understanding them is not about gaming the algorithm — it is about making sure the algorithm can find the people who would benefit from what you already know.

If you have been posting on LinkedIn and feeling like the platform has stopped working, revisit these ten areas. The platform has not stopped working.

The playbook just changed.


Dr. Mazlan Abbas is the CEO and co-founder of FAVORIOT, an AIoT platform company. He has been listed as a Top 50 Global Thought Leader in IoT, Smart Cities, and GovTech. He writes about technology, startups, and personal brand building at mazlanabbas.com.

HOW-TO Grow Your Threads Social Media Playbook

By Dr. Mazlan Abbas

Most people who join Threads make the same mistake.

They treat it like Twitter. They post content, drop a link, and wait for followers.

That approach does not work here.

I have been observing social media platforms long enough to know that every platform has its own culture, its own rhythm, and its own algorithm logic. Threads is no different. And right now, in 2026, it is one of the most interesting opportunities available for anyone serious about building a personal brand or thought leadership presence.

Here is why.

The Window Is Still Open

Threads now has 400 million monthly active users. In January 2026, it surpassed X in daily active mobile users for the first time. That is a significant signal.

But more importantly for creators and thought leaders — organic reach on Threads is still unusually high.

On Instagram, a typical post reaches 5 to 10 percent of your followers. On Threads, a well-crafted post regularly reaches two to five times your follower count. Your content gets pushed to people who do not follow you yet.

That is the growth mechanic. And it will not last forever.

Platforms always start open and gradually close as they mature and introduce advertising models. We saw it with Facebook. We saw it with Instagram. We saw it with LinkedIn.

The creators who move early win the most. The ones who wait until a platform is saturated wonder why it no longer works.

What Makes Threads Different

Threads is not Twitter. It is not Instagram. It is not LinkedIn.

It is a text-first conversational platform that rewards authenticity and genuine engagement over polished broadcast content.

Think of it this way. Instagram is your portfolio. Threads is your coffee shop.

The algorithm on Threads is built around conversation. Posts with genuine replies outperform broadcasts. This means smaller accounts can compete with established ones. If you can spark real discussion, the platform will push your content further.

This is exactly the opposite of what most social media platforms do once they mature.

The Playbook

After studying what actually works on Threads in 2026, here is the playbook I recommend.

1. Optimise Your Profile First

Before you post a single word, make sure your profile is working for you.

Your bio needs to answer three questions immediately:

  • Who are you?
  • What do you talk about?
  • Why should someone follow you?

A weak bio says: “Entrepreneur. Speaker. Husband.”

A strong bio says: “IoT founder building FAVORIOT. 40 years in tech. Daily takes on AIoT, smart cities, and what the industry gets wrong.”

The difference is specificity. Give someone a reason to hit follow before they have ever read your posts.

Also connect your Threads account to Instagram. Your posts can surface on Instagram, and your existing Instagram followers can discover you on Threads. Cross-platform discovery is built into the system. Use it.

2. Post With a Strong Hook

The first line of every Threads post is everything.

If you lose someone in the first sentence, they scroll past. The platform does not give you a second chance.

The hooks that consistently work are:

  • The specific number: “I made this mistake in 3 out of my last 5 IoT projects.”
  • The pattern interrupt: “Stop building dashboards. Build outcomes.”
  • The curiosity gap: “The one thing we changed at FAVORIOT that reduced churn by half.”
  • The contrarian take: “Everyone is talking about AI in IoT. Most will fail for the same reason they failed before AI existed.”
  • The story opener: “Five years ago, we almost shut FAVORIOT down. Here is what happened.”

Notice the pattern. Every hook is specific, creates curiosity, and makes a promise that the rest of the post delivers on.

Generic openers like “Some thoughts on IoT today” or “A few tips on personal branding” get ignored.

3. Choose Your Content Format

Unlike Instagram, where video dominates, Threads gives different formats genuine opportunity.

The three formats worth understanding are:

Text-only posts. Simple and easiest to produce at volume. When the idea is strong, text alone performs very well. This is the native format of the platform.

Photo posts. Strong for personal storytelling and adding a human face to your content. A photo of you at a conference, at a whiteboard, or behind the scenes of your work adds context that text alone cannot.

Short video clips. Higher production effort, but worth it if you are already creating video for other platforms. Repurpose a keynote clip or a 60-second camera talk and post it natively.

The mix I suggest: 60 percent text-only, 30 percent photo, 10 percent video. Adjust based on what your own analytics show after 30 days.

4. Engagement Is Not Optional

Here is the single most important thing most people get wrong about Threads.

It is a conversation platform. If you treat it like a billboard — post and disappear — the algorithm treats you like a ghost.

There are two engagement obligations that matter.

Reply to your own comments within the first hour. When someone comments on your post, reply. This signals to the algorithm that your post is generating active conversation, which triggers more distribution. It also builds real relationships with people who took time to engage with you.

Spend time engaging with others in your niche. Not lazy comments like “Great post!” or “So true!” Those do nothing. Add genuine value. Share a different perspective. Ask a thoughtful follow-up question. When your comment is more insightful than most people’s posts, the creator’s audience notices you.

I would suggest spending 30 minutes daily on meaningful engagement with others. That time investment returns far more than simply posting more content.

5. Post Consistently — But Do Not Disappear After Two Weeks

The most common Threads failure pattern I observe is this: someone joins with enthusiasm, posts for two weeks, gets minimal early engagement, and quits.

They blame the platform. They say Threads does not work.

The problem is rarely the platform. The problem is they stopped before the algorithm had enough signal to know who to show their content to.

Consistency is the compound interest of social media. It takes time to build momentum. The creators who post daily for 90 days — even imperfectly — almost always outperform the ones who post perfectly for two weeks and disappear.

A sustainable rhythm beats a perfect one.

6. Use Topic Tags Strategically

Threads has its own version of hashtags called Topic Tags.

The approach that works is writing posts with natural-language, searchable phrasing rather than just tagging with labels. Think about how your audience would search for the topic, not how you would categorise it internally.

A post titled “How to avoid the 3 most expensive mistakes in IoT platform development” will surface in search and explore feeds far better than a post labelled “#IoT #tips #platform.”

Think of every Threads post as a small SEO document — clear, specific, and searchable.

7. Track What Works — Then Double Down

After 30 days of consistent posting, review your analytics.

Look at which posts generated the most replies, reposts, and profile visits. Look at which formats performed best. Look at when your audience is most active.

Then ask the right questions:

  • Was it the hook?
  • Was it the topic?
  • Was it the format?
  • Was it the time of posting?

Once you find a pattern, replicate it deliberately. If a contrarian take about IoT got ten times the engagement of a how-to tip, that is your signal. Create more contrarian takes.

Optimal posting time, based on data from millions of Threads posts, tends to be weekday mornings. But your specific audience may behave differently. Trust your own data over general advice.

The Mistake That Will Kill Your Growth

The biggest strategic mistake on Threads is treating it as a broadcast channel.

Post. Drop a link. Disappear. Repeat.

That is not how this platform works.

Threads rewards people who show up as humans — who share real perspectives, engage in real conversations, and build genuine community around specific ideas.

The creators growing fastest on Threads are not the ones with the most polished content. They are the ones who are most consistently present, most willing to share a real opinion, and most genuinely interested in the conversations they start.<br>

A Final Observation

Every time a new platform emerges, the majority of creators wait too long before taking it seriously.

They watch early movers build audiences and wonder what the secret was.

The secret is usually just timing and consistency.

Threads in 2026 is still in that early window. The organic reach is real. The opportunity is real. The platform is actively investing in creator features and expanding monetisation options.

But windows close.

The question is not whether Threads is worth your time. The question is whether you will show up consistently enough and early enough to benefit from it.

I hope this playbook gives you a clear starting point.

Now go post something.


Dr. Mazlan Abbas is the CEO and co-founder of FAVORIOT, an AIoT platform company. He writes about IoT, startups, smart cities, and personal brand building at mazlanabbas.com.