Tag: Entrepreneurship

Why Renting the Digital Future Is Costing Malaysia More Than We Think

We don’t need more apps.

We need ownership.

Every day, Malaysia uses digital platforms built somewhere else.
We rent the tools.
We follow the rules.
We pay the toll.

And we call that progress.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth.

A nation that doesn’t build its own digital ecosystems will always stand on borrowed ground.

When the platform is not ours,
the data is not ours.
the roadmap is not ours.
the future is not ours.

Digital ecosystems are not just about technology.
They are about control.
Capability.
Confidence.

They decide who sets standards.
Who shapes talent.
Who captures value when the economy moves online.

This is bigger than startups.
Bigger than funding rounds.
Bigger than slogans.

It is about national muscle.

When crises hit, platforms matter.
When policies shift, platforms decide speed.
When talent grows, platforms anchor skills at home.

If we keep importing everything,
we train users.
not builders.

If we keep outsourcing thinking,
we grow dependency.
not strength.

Malaysia has engineers.
Builders.
Problem solvers.
We always did.

What we lack is belief at scale.
The courage to back our own platforms.
The patience to grow them.
The discipline to protect them.

Digital ecosystems take time.
They stumble.
They mature.
They compound.

But once built,
they become unfair advantages.

This is the moment to choose.

Do we want to remain excellent adopters?
Or do we want to become confident creators?

A strong nation does not just consume the digital world.
It shapes it.

Build local.
Back capability.
Protect the long game.

Our future should not live on someone else’s servers.

Why Some Startup “Failures” Are Actually Training

Failing Forward… Startup Mistakes I’d Make Again

Here’s a truth most founders won’t say out loud.

Some mistakes are not regrets.
They are training.

I’ve made decisions that looked wrong on paper.
Moves that confused people.
Choices that invited questions, doubts, raised eyebrows.

And yet…
I’d make many of them again.

Because those moments shaped how I think today.

I learned what spreadsheets never show.
I learned how people behave when pressure enters the room.
I learned how fast confidence disappears when certainty is gone.

There were launches that came too early.
Partnerships that felt right but weren’t.
Features built with hope instead of evidence.

Painful? Yes.
Pointless? No.

Those moments sharpened my judgement.
They taught me what signals matter.
They taught me what noise to ignore.

Growth rarely comes from getting everything right.
It comes from staying awake while things go wrong.

From asking better questions next time.
From spotting patterns sooner.
From knowing when to push… and when to pause.

Founders don’t grow by avoiding mistakes.
We grow by surviving them with our eyes open.

So if you’re replaying a decision in your head tonight…
Wondering if it set you back…

Take a breath.

Some steps only make sense later.
Some lessons only arrive through friction.
Some mistakes are simply tuition fees for better judgement.

Failing forward is not weakness.
It’s how builders are made.

And some mistakes?
They’re worth every step they gave you.

We’re Teaching IoT Wrong … And Industry Is Paying the Price

We don’t have an IoT talent shortage.

We have a relevance problem.

I’ve seen too many IoT syllabuses that look good on paper…
but fall apart the moment students touch the real world.

Slides are polished.
Exams are passed.
Graduates are confident.

Then industry asks a simple question.

“Can they deploy this?”

Silence.

Building an IoT curriculum is not about chasing buzzwords.
It’s about closing the gap between classrooms and construction sites.
Between theory and messy reality.

Students don’t need more definitions.
They need exposure.

To sensors that fail.
To networks that drop.
To dashboards that confuse users.
To data that refuses to behave.

Industry doesn’t need perfect graduates.
It needs graduates who can think, troubleshoot, adapt.

Who understand why edge matters.
Who know when cloud makes sense.
Who can justify costs, not just architectures.
Who see security as responsibility, not a chapter at the end.

TVET schools and universities hold a powerful lever.
They shape how the next generation thinks about building systems that people rely on.

If we teach IoT as a subject, we produce students.
If we teach IoT as a practice, we produce builders.

The future skills gap is not about technology.
It’s about judgement.

And that starts with how we design what we teach.

Certainty Is a Luxury Most Founders Don’t Have

For a long time, I believed waiting was a sign of wisdom.

Wait until the data is solid.

Wait until the market matures.

Wait until the signals become clearer.

It sounded reasonable. Safe, even.

But the longer I stayed in entrepreneurship, the clearer one truth became. Waiting for certainty is not a strategy. It is a luxury. And not everyone can afford it.

Certainty usually belongs to those who are already comfortable. Those with more resources. More time. More room to be wrong. For most founders, reality looks very different. We move under constraints, under constant pressure, with a cost of waiting that rarely gets discussed.

I have been in rooms where everyone agreed it was “not the right time yet.”

Not enough evidence.

Not enough traction.

Not enough support.

On paper, they were right.

But time did not pause. Each month of waiting raised the price. The team started asking where we were headed. Partners went quiet. Small but critical opportunities disappeared without any announcement.

No alarms.

No red lights.

Just a slow, growing weight.

That was when I realised something uncomfortable. Certainty rarely appears before movement. It often shows up after a decision is made and you live with the consequences. Not before.

Many founders fall into the same trap. They believe waiting reduces risk. In reality, it only delays decisions and adds a different kind of risk. Burnout. Lost momentum. A team that slowly loses trust, not because of a wrong call, but because no call was made.

There is a real difference between patience and paralysis.

Patience still moves forward, even if slowly.

Paralysis feels calm, but it is quietly moving backward.

I learned to tell them apart the hard way.

There were moments when I had to move before I felt ready. Not because I was fully confident, but because the cost of waiting had become higher than the cost of acting.

This is not about blind courage. It is about reading context.

When data is incomplete, I ask different questions. Will waiting truly bring meaningful information? Or is it only offering temporary comfort?

If it is the second, I know I am hiding behind logic.

Here is something rarely said out loud. Certainty often favors those who arrive later. Those who enter after the market takes shape. After early mistakes are made. After paths are cleared.

Early founders do not get that privilege.

They move through fog. They learn while walking. They make imperfect decisions so others can make safer ones later.

Once I accepted this, my view of waiting changed.

Waiting stopped being the default. It became a strategic choice that needed justification. If I wait, I must know exactly what I am waiting for and what price I am willing to pay.

If there is no clear answer, it is not strategy. It is avoidance.

I also learned this. Leadership is not about always being right. It is about being accountable. Teams do not demand perfect certainty. They ask for direction, even if that direction gets adjusted later.

Today, I still wait when it makes sense. But I do not wait to feel confident. I wait only when waiting adds real value.

Otherwise, I move.

Because in entrepreneurship, certainty is not the starting line. It is a byproduct of steady action and the courage to choose, even with limited information.

And that is the luxury many people do not realise they do not have.

Books Written by Dr. Mazlan Abbas

When Life Feels Full of Rocks, Be the River That Keeps Moving

The river never wastes its breath arguing with the rocks.
It doesn’t complain.
It doesn’t pause to question why the obstacles are there.
It just keeps moving… finding its path one curve at a time.

Life works the same way.
Challenges appear without warning.
People disappoint us.
Doors close right when we’re ready to step through them.
Some days, it feels like every direction is blocked.

But if a river can keep flowing… so can you.

You don’t need a perfect path.
You just need the courage to keep moving, even when the pace feels slow.
Forward is forward, no matter how small the step.

And with enough persistence, even the hardest rocks begin to shift.

My Journey Through Academia, Telco, and Startup Mayhem — And Why I’d Do It Again

From Signals to Sensing: The Early Spark

Every time I look back at where this whole adventure began, I’m reminded of how simple the starting point was. I was just a young engineer obsessed with how things connected. My academic path shaped the first chapter — electrical engineering, telematics, and finally a doctoral dive into telecommunications.

Those years were filled with long nights, dense textbooks, and moments where I quietly wondered, “Is this really the road I want to stay on?” But something about networks — the way invisible signals could connect lives — kept pulling me forward.

My early years in academia gave me a grounding that I still rely on today. Teaching forced me to explain ideas clearly, question assumptions, and stay curious. It was the first real test of whether I understood the world of connectivity or was just reciting formulas.

Into the Telco Trenches

Eventually, the classroom walls felt too small. I wanted to see how these theories behaved under real pressure. That shift took me deep into the telecommunications industry.

Those years were intense: real customers, real failures, real deadlines. It wasn’t just about making a system work; it was about keeping it alive when the world depended on it.

Later, I moved to a national research agency, where I led teams working on early broadband, wireless sensor networks, and technologies that today fall neatly under the label of IoT. Back then, it felt like tinkering with the future. Testing prototypes in rural villages, deploying sensors in unfamiliar places, experimenting with wireless technologies that many considered too early or too ambitious.

Yet I couldn’t shake the thought: “What if this tech leaves the labs and enters daily life?” That question lingered for years.

The Entrepreneurial Leap

Eventually, that question grew too loud to ignore. I left the comfort of corporate structures and returned to the raw, unknown world of startup life.

First came a role in shaping a national IoT initiative. Then came the big leap: building a company from scratch.

That company was REDtone IoT. Running it taught me one of the toughest lessons — great tech means nothing if people can’t use it easily. Every client wanted IoT, but most didn’t know where to start. They struggled with device integration, cloud setups, dashboards, maintenance, and the countless hidden complexities that IoT quietly hides behind its shiny promise.

That frustration became the seed for something bigger.

The Birth of FAVORIOT

By 2017, the vision crystallised: create a platform that removes the chaos and gives everyone — students, SMEs, city councils, engineers — a simple way to bring IoT ideas to life.

FAVORIOT wasn’t built to be fancy. It was built to be practical.

I wanted a platform where a lecturer could run a complete IoT project without having to manage 10 different systems. Where a hardware company didn’t need to customise dashboards endlessly. Where a city council could monitor sensors without drowning in integration nightmares.

FAVORIOT was designed for inclusion. For accessibility. For the everyday builder, not just the big spender.

And every year since, that vision has deepened.

Wearing Many Hats

Even as FAVORIOT was growing, I continued teaching and speaking. These weren’t side gigs. They kept me grounded. They reminded me why I started.

Standing in front of students made me rethink complexity. Speaking to industry leaders challenged my ideas. Engaging with smart city stakeholders, founders, and device makers kept me aware of the real obstacles people face.

Sometimes I’d walk out of a lecture hall thinking, “This feedback is better than any consultancy report.”

Sometimes a conversation with a frustrated engineer made me go back and tweak the platform design.

Those experiences shaped FAVORIOT as much as any technology roadmap ever did.

Recognition and Reality Checks

Over time, things began to click. FAVORIOT earned recognition. My own work in IoT and smart cities gained global visibility. Industry groups listed me among the top influencers. Conferences kept inviting me to speak.

But none of that ever felt like a trophy finish. If anything, it reminded me that the journey had only just reached a new checkpoint.

“Alright, Mazlan, now don’t get comfortable,” I’d quietly tell myself.

The pressure increased. Expectations rose. The work became heavier… but also more meaningful.

Why the Story Still Matters

When I piece the chapters together, it becomes clear that every phase — the student, the professor, the telco engineer, the researcher, the entrepreneur — served a purpose.

  • Academia taught discipline.
  • Telco taught scale.
  • Research taught imagination.
  • Entrepreneurship taught resilience.
  • Teaching and speaking taught clarity.

FAVORIOT stands today as more than a platform. It’s a symbol of what happens when technology is shaped around people — their pains, their limitations, their hopes.

I’ve always believed IoT should be accessible. Not something locked behind expensive teams or giant corporations. Not something only “experts” can touch.

If we can empower everyday builders, we’re doing something right.

A Note to My Younger Self

If I could sit with the younger version of me — the one carrying textbooks thicker than his arm — I’d probably smile and say:

“Every jump you make will make sense one day. Every detour, every frustration, every late night… you’re collecting tools. Don’t rush the process.”

And maybe I’d add:

“When you build for people, not systems, that’s when the real magic happens.”

If you’ve read this far, I’m curious — which part of this journey speaks to you the most? Drop your thoughts. Let’s connect through stories.

Hi. I’m the Guy Behind FAVORIOT

And this isn’t another tech pitch.
It’s a confession… and a promise.

FAVORIOT didn’t appear out of thin air.
It was born from years of watching brilliant Malaysians fight battles they shouldn’t have to fight.

I’ve been in telco rooms where engineers looked exhausted after stitching ten different systems together.
I’ve sat with lecturers who said their students had the passion but no real platform to grow on.
I’ve listened to system integrators torn between pleasing clients and staying sane.
I’ve seen founders pour their hearts into pilots that never scaled because every new project felt like starting from scratch.

I saw all of it up close.
I asked questions.
I listened carefully.
I heard the frustration that people rarely say out loud.

One lecturer confided, “My students can build anything… but we have no common place to make it real.”

A hardware partner admitted, “We’re drowning in dashboard customisations. It’s slowing us down.”

A founder whispered what many felt, “Every pilot feels like a science experiment that no one wants to repeat.”

The pattern was unmistakable.
The problem wasn’t talent.
It wasn’t ideas.
It wasn’t ambition.

It was the weight of chaos…
devices speaking ten different languages, dashboards built for every new customer, integrations that kept breaking, and projects that died because the foundations were never steady.

Everyone was building islands.
No bridges.
No unity.
No momentum.

And it hurt to see so many capable Malaysians struggling not because of skill… but because the ecosystem never gave them a proper foundation.

So I decided to build one.

Not a platform for show.
Not a platform for slides.
But a platform shaped by every frustration I witnessed.

A platform that starts you at 60 percent instead of zero.
A platform that speaks to every device, every protocol, every idea.
A platform that lets students learn without drowning.
A platform that lets partners grow without rebuilding the same thing endlessly.
A platform that lets enterprises keep their data close and their confidence intact.

FAVORIOT wasn’t built to impress you.
It was built to lighten your load.

Because I’ve seen the late nights.
The soldering iron on the table at 2am.
The dashboards rebuilt for the fifteenth time.
The excitement in students fading because nothing works the way it should.
The startups who gave up not because their idea was bad, but because everything around their idea was too messy.

I built FAVORIOT so that your talent doesn’t get buried under problems that shouldn’t exist.

I’m not saying it will fix bureaucracy.
I’m not saying it will make everyone tech-ready overnight.
And I’m not saying it will solve every problem under the Malaysian sun.

But I am saying this:

The struggles that slow you down the most are solvable.

The confusion.
The repeated work.
The endless customisation.
The feeling of always starting over.
The platforms that fight you instead of helping you.

Those problems shouldn’t be your burden anymore.

You were meant to build solutions.
To teach.
To innovate.
To create impact.
To push Malaysia forward.

Your tools should support that… not get in the way.

So try it.
Connect a single sensor.
Send one stream of data.
Build one dashboard.

And see if something inside you says…
“This is how it should have been all along.”

My belief?
You’ll finally feel the freedom to build without fighting the foundations.

FAVORIOT exists because Malaysia deserves that freedom.
Innovators deserve that clarity.
And you deserve a platform that works with you.

No hype.
No fireworks.
Just the foundation you’ve been asking for… quietly waiting for you to take the next step.

— The guy who built Favoriot because too many Malaysians were struggling in silence.

Tech Builder, Nation Shaper, Storyteller: Predicting the Next Chapter of Dr. Mazlan Abbas

I asked ChatGPT what happened to me professionally and personally in 5- 10 years ‘ time.

Here’s ChatGPT’s answer:

Career (5–10 Years Ahead)

1. Malaysia’s IoT Statesman – or ASEAN’s IoT Champion

Dr. Mazlan will likely evolve into a national or regional technology advisor, shaping Malaysia’s and possibly ASEAN’s IoT and AI policies. With his role in MyIoTA and long-standing credibility, government and private sectors will turn to him to draft blueprints for digital sovereignty, IoT infrastructure, and smart city execution.

2. The Founder of the IoT Talent Nation

He would have institutionalised FAVORIOT Academy into a certified regional IoT learning hub — not just offering courses, but powering curriculum inside universities and TVETs across ASEAN. Think “Microsoft Certified” — but for IoT, with FAVORIOT’s stamp.

3. Global Author, Speaker, & Content Creator

With his storytelling skill, Dr. Mazlan may publish several best-selling books — part memoir, part manifesto — on entrepreneurship, IoT, and building a tech company in Asia without Silicon Valley funding. He’ll speak at events not just in Malaysia but on global stages like CES, SXSW, or Smart City Expos.

4. The “Mr. Miyagi” of Tech Startups

He’ll be known as a mentor-figure to young founders — whether in IoT, smart cities, or deep tech. Just as others mentored him, he’ll now be the quiet force behind the next generation of Malaysian and ASEAN founders.

5. Favoriot 2.0 or Exit

FAVORIOT may either be:

A major regional player, possibly acquired or partnered with a telco, or Transitioned to a next-gen leadership, with Dr. Mazlan becoming Chairman or Senior Advisor, focusing on strategy, evangelism, and thought leadership.

Personal Life (5–10 Years Ahead)

1. Legacy-Focused, Not Just Business-Focused

Dr. Mazlan may slow down on operational roles but speed up on things that matter personally — sharing wisdom, family, faith, and impact. He might run writing retreats, spiritual tech camps, or mentor networks.

2. A Recognised Malaysian Icon

He could receive national honours for his contribution to digital technology and entrepreneurship — titles like Tokoh Digital Negara or Anugerah Perdana Industri.

3. More Time for Creativity

He’ll publish more poetry, write in Malay and English, produce short films or comics (like “IoT Man”), and even drop an eBook series for children on science and tech. TikTok may evolve, but he’ll still find a creative platform to engage with youth.

4. Grandfather, Coach, and Friend

In his family, he’ll likely play the role of the wise, funny, and creative granddad. Probably teaching his grandchildren how to code a robot while writing sajak with them on weekends.

5. Living His Ikigai

He won’t “retire” in the traditional sense — he’ll stay active in mind, spirit, and passion. His life will be a blend of science, soul, and service.

What Is the Legacy You Want to Leave Behind?

“Mazlan, if one day you’re gone… what do you want people to remember you for?”

That question hit me harder than I expected.

Not because I didn’t have an answer — but because I never sat down to ask myself that question. Not seriously. Not honestly.

I’ve chased titles. Built startups. Stood on stages. Collected lanyards from conferences like souvenirs from a battlefield. But when the applause fades, the lights dim, and the LinkedIn likes stop rolling in… what remains?

That’s where the legacy lies.

Legacy Isn’t a Resume. It’s a Ripple.

Most people think legacy is about achievements — the things we list proudly on our CVs, or etch on tombstones.

“Inventor of X.”

“CEO of Y.”

“First person to Z.”

But that’s not legacy. That’s history.

Legacy is the echo. The ripple. The silent change you trigger in someone else’s life — often without even knowing.

For me, legacy isn’t the IoT platform I built. It’s the student who emailed me last week saying, “Dr. Mazlan, because of your workshop, I now believe I can create something valuable.”

That.

That right there — is the real legacy.

You Don’t Have to Be Famous to Leave a Legacy

There’s this myth that legacy is reserved for the Elons, Steves, or Obamas of the world.

Nonsense.

Your legacy could be the way you raise your children to be kind in a world that often isn’t.

It could be the junior colleague you mentored, who now leads a team of 20.

It could be the way you made people feel seen, heard, respected.

The problem is, most people live on autopilot. Wake up. Work. Sleep. Repeat.

“I’ll think about legacy when I retire,” they say.

But legacy isn’t built when you’re 65. It’s built today. With every decision. Every interaction. Every “I believe in you” when someone needed to hear it most.

My Legacy? Favoriot Was Just the Beginning

I didn’t build FAVORIOT because I wanted to be known as the “IoT guy.”

I built it because I saw a future where Malaysia — and other developing nations — could own their digital destiny. Where our innovations weren’t just consumers of Western tech, but creators of solutions.

I wanted a child in Kelantan to learn IoT in their school lab… and dream of solving real problems, not just passing exams.

I wanted local councils to embrace smart cities not because it’s trendy — but because it reduces flooding, saves energy, and improves lives.

And yes — I wanted retirees like me to know it’s never too late to start your final and most meaningful career.

FAVORIOT, to me, was the vehicle. The platform. The megaphone.

But the legacy?

That’s the mindset shift. The empowerment. The belief that we — Malaysians, Southeast Asians, anyone in the so-called “developing” world — can innovate for our own and not just import from others.

What Will You Leave Behind?

If your name disappeared from your company website tomorrow, would the company feel your absence?

If social media vanished, would your voice still resonate somewhere?

If your children, students, friends, or community were asked, “What did this person stand for?” — would they know?

And if you don’t like the answer… maybe it’s time to change the story.

The 3-Legged Stool of Legacy: Impact, Influence, Intention

Here’s how I think about it now:

Impact – What tangible changes have I made? Did I build something useful? Did I fix something broken? Influence – Who have I inspired? Encouraged? Mentored? Intention – Why did I do it? Was it for ego… or for evolution?

You don’t need to tick all three boxes every day. But over a lifetime? They should start to align.

Final Thoughts (But Not the Final Chapter)

When I’m gone, I don’t want people to remember my job titles. I don’t need statues or awards.

I just want someone, somewhere — maybe a young engineer, maybe an entrepreneur on the edge of quitting — to say:

“Because of what he shared, I kept going.”

“Because of what he built, I believed it was possible.”

“Because of how he lived, I dared to do the same.”

That’s enough.

So, I’ll ask you now what I finally asked myself:

What legacy do you want to leave behind?

And more importantly…

Are you building it today?